seriously. ff a gay man can't rule on gay issues, what can he rule on? can he rule on issues related to straight people? women? men? custody issues but only when they involve gay - or is that straight - children? can he rule on banking issues? what about land swaps? likewise, can a heterosexual judge not rule on issues related to other heterosexuals? should only gay people rule on straight issues and straight people rule on gay issues? should only married people rule on marriage? should only divorced people hear (or is that not hear) divorce cases? should cat owners only rule on dog issues? can a woman rule on men's issues? can a woman rule on women's issues? how on earth can a human rule on issues related to farm animals or land swaps? should only a medical doctor rule on malpractice issues? or should medical doctors rule on veterinary issues? or should we just decide now that architects rule on medical issues and doctors rule on calculus issues so that we're sure no one understands what's going on?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gay_marriage_trial
sigh
No comments:
Post a Comment